Factors associated with the performance of extended colonic resection vs. Segmental resection in early-onset colorectal cancer: Apopulation-basedstudy

4Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Early-onset colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence rates are rising. This group is susceptible to heritable conditions (i.e., Lynch syndrome (LS)) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) with high metachronous CRC rates after segmental resection. Hence, extended colonic resection (ECR) is often performed and considered generally in young patients. As there are no population-based studies analyzing resection extent in early-onset CRC, we used CDC Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER) data to assess state-wide operative practices. METHODS: Using CER and Louisiana Tumor Registry data, all CRC patients aged ≤50 years, diagnosed in Louisiana in 2011, who underwent surgery in 2011 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. Prevalence of, and the factors associated with operation type (ECR including subtotal/total/proctocolectomy vs. segmental resection) were evaluated. RESULTS: Of 2,427 CRC patients, 274 were aged ≤50 years. In all, 234 underwent surgery at 53 unique facilities and 6.8% underwent ECR. Statistically significant ECR-Associated factors included age ≤45 years, polyposis, synchronous/metachronous LS-Associated cancers, and IBD. Abnormal microsatellite instability (MSI) was not ECR-Associated. ECR was not performed in sporadic CRC. CONCLUSIONS: ECR is performed in the setting of clinically obvious associated high-risk features (polyposis, IBD, synchronous/ metachronous cancers) but not in isolated/sporadic CRC. However, attention must be paid to patients with seemingly lower risk characteristics (isolated CRC, no polyposis), as LS can still be present. In addition, the presumed sporadic group requires further study as metachronous CRC risk in early-onset sporadic CRC has not been well-defined, and some may harbor undefined/ undiagnosed hereditary conditions. Abnormal MSI (LS risk) is not associated with ECR; abnormal MSI results often return postoperatively after segmental resection has already occurred, which is a contributing factor.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Karlitz, J. J., Sherrill, M. R., DiGiacomo, D. V., Hsieh, M. C., Schmidt, B., Wu, X. C., & Chen, V. W. (2016). Factors associated with the performance of extended colonic resection vs. Segmental resection in early-onset colorectal cancer: Apopulation-basedstudy. Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.1038/ctg.2016.17

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free