The object of inquiry in these pages is to arrive at a better understanding of a frequently used but seldom explained terminology in the history of modern philosophy. The distinction is that ostensibly between seventeenth-century Rationalism and eighteenth-century Empiricism. The division is of immediate relevance in historically situating the philosophy of Gottfried Wilhelm von Leibniz. A historian may want to know whether Leibniz swims with or against the current of his times, whether or not Rationalism rightly characterizes “mainstream” seventeenth-century European thought, what it means to be a Rationalist as opposed to an Empiricist, and whether or not there is anything to be gained by considering Leibniz as a thinker promoting specifically Rationalist rather than Empiricist philosophy.
CITATION STYLE
Jacquette, D. (2016). Leibniz’s empirical, not empiricist methodology. In Tercentenary Essays on the Philosophy and Science of Leibniz (pp. 179–202). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38830-4_8
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.