Validation of the Diabetes Prevention Trial-Type 1 Risk Score in the TrialNet Natural History Study

42Citations
Citations of this article
43Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE - We assessed the accuracy of the Diabetes Prevention Trial-Type 1 Risk Score (DPTRS), developed fromthe Diabetes Prevention Trial-Type 1 (DPT-1), in the TrialNet Natural History Study (TNNHS). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - Prediction accuracy of the DPTRS was assessed with receiver-operating characteristic curve areas. The type 1 diabetes cumulative incidence within the DPTRS intervals was compared between the TNNHS and DPT-1 cohorts. RESULTS - Receiver-operating characteristic curve areas for the DPTRSwere substantial in the TNNHS (P < 0.001 at both 2 and 3 years). The type 1 diabetes cumulative incidence did not differ significantly between the TNNHS and DPT-1 cohorts within DPTRS intervals. In the TNNHS, 2-year and 3-year risks were low for DPTRS intervals <6.50 (<0.10 and <0.20, respectively). Thresholds ≥7.50 were indicative of high risk in both cohorts (2-year risks: 0.49 in the TNNHS and 0.51 in DPT-1). CONCLUSIONS - The DPTRS is an accurate and robust predictor of type 1 diabetes in autoantibody-positive populations. © 2011 by the American Diabetes Association.

References Powered by Scopus

Get full text
717Citations
290Readers

This article is free to access.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

This article is free to access.

This article is free to access.

This article is free to access.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sosenko, J. M., Skyler, J. S., Mahon, J., Krischer, J. P., Beam, C. A., Boulware, D. C., … Palmer, J. P. (2011). Validation of the Diabetes Prevention Trial-Type 1 Risk Score in the TrialNet Natural History Study. Diabetes Care, 34(8), 1785–1787. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc11-0641

Readers over time

‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2502468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 11

39%

Researcher 11

39%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

14%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 17

59%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7

24%

Engineering 3

10%

Chemistry 2

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0