Blood transfusion prescribing in the ACT: an insight into clinical decision making.

3Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Medical practitioners with varying levels of experience may make medical decisions in hospitals. Little is known about who is responsible for these decisions. We determined transfusion appropriateness during an audit of blood transfusion, before developing practice improvement strategies, by concurrent medical record review. The prescriber could be determined in 78% of transfusion episodes: most were specialist staff. Registrars and after-hours staff prescribed significantly fewer inappropriate transfusions. The findings have significant implications in understanding clinical decision making in the hospital setting and for the targeting of quality improvement strategies in particular.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Crispin, P. J., Crowe, B. J., & McDonald, A. M. (2005). Blood transfusion prescribing in the ACT: an insight into clinical decision making. Australian Health Review : A Publication of the Australian Hospital Association, 29(2), 240–246. https://doi.org/10.1071/AH050240

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free