Stern-judging: A simple, successful norm which promotes cooperation under indirect reciprocity

144Citations
Citations of this article
121Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We study the evolution of cooperation under indirect reciprocity, believed to constitute the biological basis of morality. We employ an evolutionary game theoretical model of multilevel selection, and show that natural selection and mutation lead to the emergence of a robust and simple social norm, which we call stern-judging. Under stern-judging, helping a good individual or refusing help to a bad individual leads to a good reputation, whereas refusing help to a good individual or helping a bad one leads to a bad reputation. Similarly for tit-for-tat and win-stay-lose-shift, the simplest ubiquitous strategies in direct reciprocity, the lack of ambiguity of stern-judging, where implacable punishment is compensated by prompt forgiving, supports the idea that simplicity is often associated with evolutionary success. © 2006 Pacheco et al.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pacheco, J. M., Santos, F. C., & Chalub, F. A. C. C. (2006). Stern-judging: A simple, successful norm which promotes cooperation under indirect reciprocity. PLoS Computational Biology, 2(12), 1634–1638. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020178

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free