OA13.04. Physical health benefits of health Qigong and Energize programs in American elementary school classrooms

  • Wang C
  • Seo D
  • Geib R
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: With the increasing use of complementary and alternative medicine, mind-body exercises (i.e., Tai Chi, Yoga, and Qigong) have become more popular in the United States. In particular, numerous recent investigations have suggested the positive benefits of Qigong for cardiovascular fitness, musculoskeletal conditions, and stress. However, such research is largely limited to adults and the elderly. Few studies have explored the benefits of Qigong in the pediatric population. Thus, the purpose of this study is to investigate: (1) whether Health Qigong is effective, and (2) how effective it is compared with conventional exercise among elementary school children. Methods: A pre- and post-test quasi-experimental design was used to assess the effects of three different modes of exercise: (1) aerobic exercise (Energize), (2) mind-body exercise (Health Qigong), and (3) conventional physical education (PE) activities, in terms of improving health during a 16-week intervention, as measured by Heart Rate (HR), Sit-and-Reach (SR), and Body Mass Index (BMI) in children. Results: One hundred and five children provided valid data from two elementary schools in Southern Indiana. Of the 105 students, 57 (35.2%) were boys. The average age was 9 years old. The repeated measures analyses of variance revealed a significant decrease in HR (F=70.54, p

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wang, C., Seo, D., Geib, R., Wroblewski, N., Van Puymbroeck, M., & Kolbe, L. (2012). OA13.04. Physical health benefits of health Qigong and Energize programs in American elementary school classrooms. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 12(S1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-12-s1-o52

Readers over time

‘13‘14‘15‘16‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 8

50%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

31%

Researcher 2

13%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 8

53%

Nursing and Health Professions 3

20%

Sports and Recreations 3

20%

Social Sciences 1

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0