Body proportions as possible predictors for free gracilis one-stage facial reanimation

1Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Gracilis muscle and its motor nerve belongs to most commonly used flap for facial reanimation. However, it is performed in two steps, which is time consuming. One stage technique can be also performed, but the length of the motor nerve cannot be currently determined before surgery. AIM: The present study was conducted in order to evaluate the body composition on the length and suitability of the motor nerve of gracilis muscle for one stage facial reanimation. METHODS: The gracilis flaps along with the motoric nerve were dissected from 20 fresh cadavers (6 females, 14 males). The length of the lower extremity from superior iliac anterior spine to the bottom of the heel and BMI were measured. Regression analysis of lower extremity length and BMI to the actual length of the motor nerve of gracilis flap was performed. RESULTS: The linear regression analysis showed a positive correlation between the length of the lower limb and the size of the motor nerve length (r = 0.5060, p < 0.05), as well as between the BMI and the size of the motor nerve length (r = 0.5073, p < 0.05). Also, the males had longer motor nerve when compared to females by 13 % (p < 0.05). No difference between females and males in BMI was observed. CONCLUSION: The length from the superior iliac anterior spine, BMI and gender seemed to be potential factors that could help to predict the length of the gracilis flap motor nerve for the one stage facial reanimation. However, further studies evaluating other anatomical factors and validating the possible prediction rule for one stage reanimation success are needed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bohac, M., Palkovic, M., Fedeles, J., & Hodosy, J. (2016). Body proportions as possible predictors for free gracilis one-stage facial reanimation. Bratislava Medical Journal, 117(9), 547–550. https://doi.org/10.4149/BLL_2016_101

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free