Preventing the Complications Associated with the Use of Dermal Fillers in Facial Aesthetic Procedures: An Expert Group Consensus Report

67Citations
Citations of this article
208Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: The use of dermal fillers in minimally invasive facial aesthetic procedures has become increasingly popular of late, yet as the indications and the number of procedures performed increase, the number of complications is also likely to increase. Paying special attention to specific patient characteristics and to the technique used can do much to avoid these complications. Indeed, a well-trained physician can also minimize the impact of such problems when they do occur. Methods: A multidisciplinary group of experts in aesthetic treatments reviewed the main factors associated with the complications that arise when using dermal fillers. A search of English, French and Spanish language articles in PubMed was performed using the terms “complications” OR “soft filler complications” OR “injectable complications” AND “dermal fillers”. An initial document was drafted that reflected the complications identified and recommendations as to how they should be handled. This document was then reviewed and modified by the expert panel, until a final text was agreed upon and validated. Results: The panel addressed consensus recommendations about the preparation, the procedure and the post-procedural care. The panel considered it crucial to obtain an accurate medical history to prevent potential complications. An additional clinical assessment, including standardized photography, is also crucial to evaluate the outcomes and prevent potential complications. Furthermore, the state of the operating theatre, the patient’s health status and the preparation of the skin are critical to prevent superficial soft tissue infections. Finally, selecting the appropriate technique, based on the physician’s experience, as well as the characteristics of the patient and filler, helps to ensure successful outcomes and limits the complications. Conclusions: This consensus document provides key elements to help clinicians who are starting to use dermal fillers to employ standard procedures and to understand how best to prevent potential complications of the treatment. Level of Evidence V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

References Powered by Scopus

The anatomy of the aging face: Volume loss and changes in 3-dimensional topography

397Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Dermal fillers in aesthetics: An overview of adverse events and treatment approaches

363Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Complications of injectable fillers, part i

195Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Polycaprolactone: How a well-known and futuristic polymer has become an innovative collagen-stimulator in esthetics

112Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Recommendations for volume augmentation and rejuvenation of the face and hands with the new generation polycaprolactone-based collagen stimulator (Ellansé®)

51Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Safe, Effective Chin and Jaw Restoration with VYC-25L Hyaluronic Acid Injectable Gel

48Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Urdiales-Gálvez, F., Delgado, N. E., Figueiredo, V., Lajo-Plaza, J. V., Mira, M., Ortíz-Martí, F., … Rebenaque, C. V. (2017, June 1). Preventing the Complications Associated with the Use of Dermal Fillers in Facial Aesthetic Procedures: An Expert Group Consensus Report. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. Springer New York LLC. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-017-0798-y

Readers over time

‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25015304560

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 71

72%

Researcher 16

16%

Professor / Associate Prof. 8

8%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 85

79%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 10

9%

Nursing and Health Professions 6

6%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6

6%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 46

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0