Objectives: To determine (1) reference values for cone androdphototransductionvariablesderivedfromthea-wave of the electroretinogram, (2) their dependence on age, (3) the progression in cone and rod variables in patients with X-linked retinitis pigmentosa (XLRP), and (4) the test-retest variability in these a-wave measures compared with the variability in cone and rod b-wave measures. Participants: One hundred control subjects aged 5 to 75 years and 24 patients with XLRP aged 5 to 38 years. Methods: High-intensity stimuli were used to elicit electroretinograms in the dark and in the presence of a rod-saturating background. Computer averaging and computer subtraction of cone components from mixed rod-cone responses were used to derive rod-only and cone a-waves. Rod and cone phototransduction variables were derived by computer fitting physiologically based computational models to the leading edges of a-wave ensembles. Results: Phototransduction efficiency, as indexed by the sensitivity variable (S), decreased with age for cone and rod-only responses, whereas maximum cone and rod pho-toresponses (Rm P3) remained constant. In patients with XLRP tested annually for 4 years, Rm P3 for rods and, to a lesser extent, cones declined with disease progression, whereas S remained stable. The test-retest variability in the a-wave Rm P3 is lower than previously reported measures of the variability in b-wave peak-to-peak amplitude. Conclusion: The leading edge of the a-wave of the elec-troretinogram can be related to rod and cone phototrans-duction variables through quantitative models. Rm P3 , rather than S, should be the outcome measure of choice when using the a-wave to follow photoreceptor function in prospective studies and treatment trials.
CITATION STYLE
Birch, D. G. (2002). Quantitative Electroretinogram Measures of Phototransduction in Cone and Rod Photoreceptors. Archives of Ophthalmology, 120(8), 1045. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.120.8.1045
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.