This article contributes to mixed-methods research in global development studies. It draws on empirical study of changes in access to livelihood resources ensuing from state-sponsored resettlement schemes in Oromia, Ethiopia. The analysis demonstrates that explaining and understanding processes and outcomes of development interventions can be expanded and deepened by the integration of quantitative and qualitative methods. Quantitative analysis uncovers the magnitude of changes, whereas qualitative analysis reveals political power relations and contextual meanings of the changes as experienced by affected people. The study shows that mixed-methods approach enables addressing the statistical and substantive significance of the variables in question and the diversity of meanings and experiences associated with development interventions. This strengthens the analytical power of research, providing opportunities to enhance evidence-based comprehension of generic patterns and specific conditions and outcomes of development interventions in diversified situations of the global South.
CITATION STYLE
Wayessa, G. O., & Nygren, A. (2023). Mixed Methods Research in Global Development Studies: State-Sponsored Resettlement Schemes in Ethiopia. European Journal of Development Research, 35(6), 1440–1464. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-023-00588-8
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.