Early IL-1 receptor blockade in severe inflammatory respiratory failure complicating COVID-19

158Citations
Citations of this article
190Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Around the tenth day after diagnosis, ∼20% of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-associated pneumonia evolve toward severe oxygen dependence (stage 2b) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (stage 3) associated with systemic inflammation often termed a cytokine storm. Because interleukin-1 (IL-1) blocks the production of IL-6 and other proinflammatory cytokines, we treated COVID-19 patients early in the disease with the IL-1 receptor antagonist, anakinra.We retrospectively compared 22 patients from three different centers in France with stages 2b and 3 COVID- 19-associated pneumonia presenting with acute severe respiratory failure and systemic inflammation who received either standardof- care treatment alone (10 patients) or combined with intravenous anakinra (12 patients). Treatment started at 300 mg d-1 for 5 d, then tapered with lower dosing over 3 d. Both populations were comparable for age, comorbidities, clinical stage, and elevated biomarkers of systemic inflammation. All of the patients treated with anakinra improved clinically (P < 0.01), with no deaths, significant decreases in oxygen requirements (P < 0.05), and more days without invasive mechanical ventilation (P < 0.06), compared with the control group. The effect of anakinra was rapid, as judged by significant decrease of fever and C-reactive protein at day 3. A mean total dose of 1,950 mg was infused with no adverse side effects or bacterial infection. We conclude that early blockade of the IL-1 receptor is therapeutic in acute hyperinflammatory respiratory failure in COVID- 19 patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cauchois, R., Koubi, M., Delarbre, D., Manet, C., Carvelli, J., Blasco, V. B., … Kaplanski, G. (2020). Early IL-1 receptor blockade in severe inflammatory respiratory failure complicating COVID-19. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 117(32), 18951–18953. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2009017117

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free