On quality of quality measures for classification

0Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this paper we provide a theoretical discussion of the impact of uncertainty in quality measurement on the expected benefits of including biometric signal quality measures in classification. While an ideal signal quality measure should be a precise quantification of the actual signal properties relevant to the classification process, a real quality measurement may be uncertain. We show how does the degree of uncertainty in quality measurement impact the gains in class separation achieved thanks to using quality measures as conditionally relevant classification feature. We demonstrate that while noisy quality measures become irrelevant classification features, they do not impair class separation beyond the baseline result. We present supporting experimental results using synthetic data. © 2008 Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kryszczuk, K., & Drygajlo, A. (2008). On quality of quality measures for classification. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 5372 LNCS, pp. 19–28). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89991-4_3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free