How many Gs are there in 'global governance' after the crisis? The perspectives of the 'marginal majority' of the world's states

57Citations
Citations of this article
49Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The G20 summit has recently emerged as the dominant agency of global governance. It claims that its economic weight and broad membership give it a high degree of legitimacy and influence over the management of the global economy and financial system. But the G20 still excludes from membership some 150 other countries, all of which have interests at stake within the contours of contemporary global governance. In the financial arena these excluded countries contributed significantly to the alternative agenda for dealing with the global financial crisis proposed by the United Nations conference that met in June 2009. In the trade arena they engaged extensively in a variety of coalitions within the World Trade Organization during the so-called Doha Round and played a part in preventing a deal emerging that was unsatisfactory from their perspective. Questions are raised about the legitimacy of the G20 by the active presence of so many other country voices outside its remit and it can be expected that the excluded 'G150' will increasingly explore different ways to engage with the members of the G20 over the next few years. © 2010 The Author(s). Journal Compilation © 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd/The Royal Institute of International Affairs.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Payne, A. (2010). How many Gs are there in “global governance” after the crisis? The perspectives of the “marginal majority” of the world’s states. International Affairs, 86(3), 729–740. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2010.00908.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free