Complex Partnerships: Self-authorship and Provocative Academic-Advising Practices

  • Pizzolato J
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
47Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Self-authorship is an additional orientation to traditional college student, epistemological, development theories. Facilitation of self-authorship, via academic advising, may help students meet the desired outcomes outlined by the Council for the Advancement of Standards in Higher Education and integrate these abilities into their knowing and decision-making processes. Through investigation of 132 student narratives about advising and selection of academic majors, I examined advising practices that are consistent with Baxter Magolda's (2001) learning partnerships model for self-authorship development. Findings suggest that student decision-making and self-authoring abilities were enhanced by advising sessions that focused explicitly on goal reflection and associated volitional planning. Students benefited from advising in which nonacademic factors were addressed. Implications for practice are discussed.Relative emphasis: * theory, research, practice

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pizzolato, J. E. (2006). Complex Partnerships: Self-authorship and Provocative Academic-Advising Practices. NACADA Journal, 26(1), 32–45. https://doi.org/10.12930/0271-9517-26.1.32

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free