A risk-based approach to flood management decisions in a nonstationary world

106Citations
Citations of this article
190Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Traditional approaches to flood management in a nonstationary world begin with a null hypothesis test of "no trend" and its likelihood, with little or no attention given to the likelihood that we might ignore a trend if it really existed. Concluding a trend exists when it does not, or rejecting a trend when it exists are known as type I and type II errors, respectively. Decision-makers are poorly served by statistical and/or decision methods that do not carefully consider both over- and under-preparation errors, respectively. Similarly, little attention is given to how to integrate uncertainty in our ability to detect trends into a flood management decision context. We show how trend hypothesis test results can be combined with an adaptation's infrastructure costs and damages avoided to provide a rational decision approach in a nonstationary world. The criterion of expected regret is shown to be a useful metric that integrates the statistical, economic, and hydrological aspects of the flood management problem in a nonstationary world. Key Points Traditional methods treat trend detection separate from decision analysis Under-preparation risks due to failure to detect trends are ignored Our approach combines hypothesis test and risk-based decisions © 2014. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rosner, A., Vogel, R. M., & Kirshen, P. H. (2014). A risk-based approach to flood management decisions in a nonstationary world. Water Resources Research, 50(3), 1928–1942. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR014561

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free