The negative impact of attorneys on mediation outcomes: A myth or a reality?

8Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Mediators often do not welcome the presence of attorneys at the mediation table. Because of the apparent contradictions between both professions, many mediators believe that the presence of attorneys is prejudicial to the mediation process. Using empirical data collected from workplace mediation cases, we have explored the actual impact of the presence of attorneys. Our results indicate that the presence of an attorney does not significantly affect the outcome of a mediation, with two exceptions. First, the presence of attorneys in a mediation process reduces the parties' level of satisfaction with the mediator. Second, the presence of an attorney would appear to hinder the level of reconciliation possible between the parties. © 2010 President and Fellows of Harvard College.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Poitras, J., Stimec, A., & Roberge, J. F. (2010). The negative impact of attorneys on mediation outcomes: A myth or a reality? Negotiation Journal, 26(1), 9–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1571-9979.2009.00251.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free