A comparative study on the varying exposure to atmospheric fine and coarse particles under urban and rural conditions

2Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper is based on the results of three air quality studies conducted in Buenos Aires in Berlin, and in German spas between 2003 and 2007. A high comparability of results was ensured by using the same sampling techniques and analytical methods. Total particle sampling was achieved by active sampling of fine (PM2.5) and passive sampling of coarse particles ≥2.5 μm and giant particles ≥10 μm. The highly absorbing, black, predominantly carbonaceous particles (BC) of fine particle samples were determined by measuring the total light attenuation of filter samples and interpreting the extinction value as black carbon. The difference between the gravimetric total mass concentration of the PM2.5 samples and the BC is defined as the transparent, mostly mineral fine fraction. In coarse/giant particle samples the mean gray value was determined by means of automated light microscopy with subsequent single-particle analysis. "Opaque" particles were separated from the "transparent" particle fraction by applying a grey value threshold level. Microscopic measurement of individual particles was employed to establish the size distribution of the coarse and giant fraction. Due to different health effects, the separate detection of these components is suggested. Decline functions of particles are given, possibly providing useful information for a more detailed specification of the local particle distribution, and for a better estimate of the individual exposure. Atmospheric dispersal of particles was found effected mainly by source characteristics. An increased, spatially largely constant level of fine transparent particles in Berlin indicates a particle plume originating from photochemical processes. Buenos Aires, in contrast, is characterized by a lower background level of fine transparent particles but is considerably affected by fine black particles from diesel emissions and by a higher resuspension of coarse/giant transparent, mainly soil particles. Mini-volume and passive sampling combined proved to be suitable for measuring total particles by collecting fine, coarse, and giant particles. This approach allows the acquisition of highly space-resolved data on a weekly basis. A method was employed to calculate a size-fractionated particle concentration from passive samples. The results from three air quality studies using this method demonstrate that the black/opaque and transparent particles distinguished differ considerably in spatial distribution, not only due to varying atmospheric residence. Estimates of the exposure of humans, therefore, have to consider the different effects of rural and urban conditions, and differences between regional climates. © 2012 Copyright 2012 A&WMA.

References Powered by Scopus

Fine particulate air pollution and mortality in 20 U.S. cities, 1987-1994

2113Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Long-term exposure to air pollution and incidence of cardiovascular events in women

1557Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Public-health impact of outdoor and traffic-related air pollution: A European assessment

1467Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Modelling of black carbon statistical distribution and return periods of extreme concentrations

24Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Particulate matter measurements with low-cost techniques in tuebingen – SW-Germany

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wolf-Benning, U., Schultz, E., Dietze, V., Kaminski, U., & Endlicher, W. (2012). A comparative study on the varying exposure to atmospheric fine and coarse particles under urban and rural conditions. Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association, 62(11), 1313–1328. https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2012.687703

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 6

46%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

38%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

15%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Environmental Science 4

40%

Social Sciences 2

20%

Engineering 2

20%

Medicine and Dentistry 2

20%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free