The Semantics Latent in Shannon Information

17Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The lore is that standard information theory provides an analysis of information quantity, but not of information content. I argue this lore is incorrect, and there is an adequate informational semantics latent in standard theory. The roots of this notion of content can be traced to the secret parallel development of an information theory equivalent to Shannon's by Turing at Bletchley Park, and it has been suggested independently in recent work by Skyrms and Bullinaria and Levy. This article explicitly articulates the semantics latent in information theory and defends it as an adequate theory of information content, or natural meaning. I argue that this theory suggests a new perspective on the classic misrepresentation worry for correlation-based semantics. 1 Introduction 2 From Correlation to Meaning 3 S-Vector Semantics 4 Meaning for Inference 5 Natural Meaning of Conventional Symbols 6 Error and Ergodicity 7 Conclusion.

References Powered by Scopus

A Mathematical Theory of Communication

37111Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Information theory and statistical mechanics

9100Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Axiomatic Derivation of the Principle of Maximum Entropy and the Principle of Minimum Cross-Entropy

1316Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Two Kinds of Information Processing in Cognition

13Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

THE RISE OF COGNITIVE SCIENCE IN THE 20TH CENTURY

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Deflating deflationism about mental representation

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Isaac, A. M. C. (2019). The Semantics Latent in Shannon Information. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 70(1), 103–125. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axx029

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 10

48%

Professor / Associate Prof. 6

29%

Researcher 3

14%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

10%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Philosophy 9

53%

Computer Science 4

24%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

12%

Psychology 2

12%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 47

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free