From innovation to transformation

16Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper reviews the leading trends in and contributions to the peer-reviewed and professional literature of serials librarianship published in 2006 and 2007. The review shows that a central topic in the literature is the nature and effect of libraries' ongoing transition from acquiring serials in print to providing access electronically. Propelled forward by user preferences, this transition is reflected in publications that reconceptualize collections and describe innovative initiatives and strategies for acquisition, access, and management. Throughout the literature, the review traces a prevailing sentiment that libraries are advancing well beyond the confines of print-centered models and are assuming new roles, imagining new possibilities, and developing new solutions.

References Powered by Scopus

Can electronic journal usage data replace citation data as a measure of journal use? An empirical examination<sup>1</sup>

84Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Use and Users of Electronic Journals at Catalan Universities: The Results of a Survey

84Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Electronic journals and user behavior: A review of recent research

69Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Service innovation in academic libraries: Is there a place for the customers?

35Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Using social media for service innovations: Challenges and pitfalls

18Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Five Years of Empirical Research in the Area of Technical Services: An Examination of Selected Peer-Reviewed Journals, 2007-2011

10Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Carr, P. L. (2009). From innovation to transformation. Library Resources and Technical Services, 53(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.5860/lrts.53n1.3

Readers over time

‘11‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2400.751.52.253

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 9

69%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

15%

Researcher 2

15%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 5

42%

Computer Science 3

25%

Design 2

17%

Arts and Humanities 2

17%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0