NATO enlargement: evaluating its consequences in Russia

16Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

It is often claimed that NATO’s post-Cold War geographic enlargement threatened Russian security interests and caused the downturn in Russia’s relations with the West. This article unpacks and challenges that causal claim, making three basic arguments. First, NATO enlargement made the alliance weaker. Russia knew this and did not react militarily to any perceived threat from Europe until after it seized Crimea in 2014. Second, the downturn in Russia’s relationship with the West was overdetermined and most likely caused by Russia’s reaction to its own declining influence in the world. While NATO’s geographic enlargement aggravated this situation, it was probably not the most significant causal factor. Third, while Russia certainly reacted negatively to NATO enlargement right from the start, the reaction was manipulated and magnified by both the nationalist opposition, and Vladimir Putin’s regime, to serve domestic political interests.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Marten, K. (2020). NATO enlargement: evaluating its consequences in Russia. International Politics, 57(3), 401–426. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-020-00233-9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free