Abstract
In an extension of Neef, Shade, and Miller (1994), we used a brief computer‐based assessment of differential responsiveness to reinforcer rate, quality, delay, and response effort in affecting the choices of 11 participants. The assessment involved successive presentations of two concurrent sets of math problems, each set associated with competing reinforcer or response dimensions in a counterbalanced fashion. The results showed that the reinforcer and response dimensions differentially affected choice, with time‐allocation patterns varying across students.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Neef, N. A., & Lutz, M. N. (2001). A BRIEF COMPUTER‐BASED ASSESSMENT OF REINFORCER DIMENSIONS AFFECTING CHOICE. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 34(1), 57–60. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2001.34-57
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.
