Catastrophic and impoverishing effects of out-of-pocket payments for health care in Albania: Evidence from Albania Living Standards Measurement Surveys 2002, 2005 and 2008

41Citations
Citations of this article
90Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The absence of or poorly functioning risk pooling mechanisms and high amounts of out-of-pocket payments for health care expose households to financial risks associated with major illnesses or accidents. The aim of this article is to analyse the extent to which out-of-pocket health spending impoverishes households in Albania. The study augments existing evidence by analysing the dynamics of such payments over different years and the weight that informal payments have in the total out-of-pocket health spending. The data used in the study come from the Albania Living Standards Measurement Survey (ALSMS) for 2002, 2005 and 2008. We measure headcount catastrophic payments using different thresholds and the decomposition of indicators by expenditure quintiles to better understand their effects. We find that out-of-pocket and informal payments have increased in real value throughout the years. Even though their catastrophic effect has gone down (due also to declining trends in absolute poverty), the effect for the poorest expenditure quintiles remains high. Out-of-pocket payments deepen the poverty headcount and also enlarge the poverty gap and again the effect is larger for the poorest quintiles. Future policy interventions should provide better protection mechanisms for the poor by providing exemption criteria or subsidized transport. They should also seek to address the widespread informal payments in the country. © 2012 The Author; all rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tomini, S. M., Packard, T. G., & Tomini, F. (2013). Catastrophic and impoverishing effects of out-of-pocket payments for health care in Albania: Evidence from Albania Living Standards Measurement Surveys 2002, 2005 and 2008. Health Policy and Planning, 28(4), 419–428. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czs073

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free