In industry, there is at once a strong need for innovation and a need to preserve the existing system of production. Thus, although the literature insists on the necessity of the current change toward Industry 4.0, how to implement it remains problematic because the preservation of the factory is at stake. Moreover, the question of the evolution of the system depends on its innovative capability, but it is difficult to understand how a new rule can be designed and implemented in a factory. This tension between preservation and innovation is often explained in the literature as a process of creative destruction. Looking at the problem from another perspective, this article models the factory as a site of creative heritage, enabling creation within tradition, i.e., creating new rules while preserving the system of rules. Two case studies are presented to illustrate the model. The paper shows that design in the factory relies on the ability to validate solutions. To do so, the design process can explore and give new meaning to the existing rules. The role of innovation management is to choose the degree of revision of the rules and to make it possible.
CITATION STYLE
Harlé, H., Le Masson, P., & Weil, B. (2021). A model of creative heritage for industry: Designing new rules while preserving the present system of rules. In Proceedings of the Design Society (Vol. 1, pp. 141–150). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2021.15
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.