Compositional algorithmic verification of software product lines

19Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Software product line engineering allows large software systems to be developed and adapted for varying customer needs. The products of a software product line can be described by means of a hierarchical variability model specifying the commonalities and variabilities between the artifacts of the individual products. The number of products generated by a hierarchical model is exponential in its size, which poses a serious challenge to software product line analysis and verification. For an analysis technique to scale, the effort has to be linear in the size of the model rather than linear in the number of products it generates. Hence, efficient product line verification is only possible if compositional verification techniques are applied that allow the analysis of products to be relativized on the properties of their variation points. In this paper, we propose simple hierarchical variability models (SHVM) with explicit variation points as a novel way to describe a set of products consisting of sets of methods. SHVMs provide a trade-off between expressiveness and a clean and simple model suitable for compositional verification. We generalize a previously developed compositional technique and tool set for the automatic verification of control-flow based temporal safety properties to product lines defined by SHVMs, and prove soundness of the generalization. The desired property relativization is achieved by introducing variation point specifications. We evaluate the proposed technique on a number of test cases. © 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schaefer, I., Gurov, D., & Soleimanifard, S. (2011). Compositional algorithmic verification of software product lines. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 6957 LNCS, pp. 184–203). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25271-6_10

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free