Quantitative trait loci mapping of multiple independent loci for resistance to fusarium oxysporum f. sp. vasinfectum Races 1 and 4 in an interspecific cotton population

29Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Fusarium wilt, caused by the soilborne fungal pathogen Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. vasinfectum, is a vascular disease of cotton (Gossypium spp.). F. oxysporum f. sp. vasinfectum race 1 (FOV1) causes major plant injury and yield loss in G. hirsutum cultivars with coinfection with root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita), while F. oxysporum f. sp. vasinfectum race 4 (FOV4) causes plant damage without nematode coinfection in G. hirsutum and in G. barbadense cultivars. Quantitative trait loci (QTL) analysis of the interspecific cross G. barbadense Pima S-7 × G. hirsutum Acala NemX revealed separate multiple loci determining resistance to FOV1 and FOV4, confirming that race specificity occurs in F. oxysporum f. sp. vasinfectum. Based on the area under the disease progress stairs, six major QTLs on chromosomes (Chrs) 1, 2, 12, 15 (2), and 21 contributing 7 to 15% to FOV1 resistance and two major QTLs on Chrs 14 and 17 contributing 12 to 33% to FOV4 resistance were identified. Minor-effect QTLs contributing to resistance to both FOV1 and FOV4 were also identified. These results define and establish a pathosystem of race-specific resistance under polygenic control. This research also validates the importance of previously reported markers and chromosome regions and adds new information for the location of F. oxysporum f. sp. vasinfectum resistance genes. Some F8 recombinant inbred lines have resistance to both FOV1 and FOV4 and also to root-knot nematode, providing multiple resistance sources for breeding.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wang, C., Ulloa, M., Duong, T., & Roberts, P. A. (2018). Quantitative trait loci mapping of multiple independent loci for resistance to fusarium oxysporum f. sp. vasinfectum Races 1 and 4 in an interspecific cotton population. Phytopathology, 108(6), 759–767. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-06-17-0208-R

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free