IMPLIKASI YURIDIS RIWAYAT TENTANG KESALAHAN PENULISAN DALAM MUSHAF USMANI

  • Rajafi A
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The history of writing error in the Qur'an derived from Aisha and justified by Khalifa Uthman bin Affan received a different responses among Islamic researchers, both from the strictly rejecting that history of writing (riwayat) until to those who accepted the existence the riwayat but with different "reading". On the legal side (juridical), the existence of that riwayat can result in juridical implications, especially in the methodological aspect. Such thought is not driven by the negative domain, but it must be in a positive domain, where the existence of that riwayat provides more progressive and responsive ijtihad, whether the answer is for the diversion to the difference of qira’at or not, the Islamic texts will be read more critically, so the legal purpose of “suitable in every time and place” would be reached.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rajafi, A. (2017). IMPLIKASI YURIDIS RIWAYAT TENTANG KESALAHAN PENULISAN DALAM MUSHAF USMANI. Al-Manahij, 11(2), 133–144. https://doi.org/10.24090/mnh.v11i2.2017.pp133-144

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free