Rural areas have problems in attracting and retaining primary care workforce. This might have consequences for the existing workforce. We studied whether general practitioners (GPs) in rural practices differ by age, sex, practice population and workload from those in less rural locations and whether their practices differ in resources and service profiles. We used data from 2 studies: QUALICOPC study collected data from 34 countries, including 7183 GPs in 2011, and Profiles of General Practice in Europe study collected data from 32 countries among 7895 GPs in 1993. Data were analyzed using multilevel analysis. Results show that the share of female GPs has increased in rural areas but is still lower than in urban areas. In rural areas, GPs work more hours and provide more medical procedures to their patients. Apart from these differences between locations, overall ageing of the GP population is evident. Higher workload in rural areas may be related to increased demand for care. Rural practices seem to cope by offering a broad range of services, such as medical procedures. Dedicated human resource policies for rural areas are required with a view to an ageing GP population, to the individual preferences and needs of the GPs, and to decreasing attractiveness of rural areas.
CITATION STYLE
Groenewegen, P. P., Bosmans, M. W. G., Boerma, W. G. W., & Spreeuwenberg, P. (2020, September 1). The primary care workforce in Europe: A cross-sectional international comparison of rural and urban areas and changes between 1993 and 2011. European Journal of Public Health. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaa125
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.