Nomenclature for cellular plasticity: are the terms as plastic as the cells themselves?

  • Mills J
  • Stanger B
  • Sander M
51Citations
Citations of this article
83Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

It is now recognized that cell identity is more fluid, and tissues more plastic, than previously thought. The plasticity of cells is relevant to diverse fields, most notably developmental and stem cell biology, regenerative medicine, and cancer biology. To date, a comprehensive and uniform nomenclature to define distinct cell states and their injury-induced interconversions has been elusive. The first Keystone Symposium devoted exclusively to cellular plasticity in regeneration and tumorigenesis was held on January 2019 in Keystone, Colorado, and featured a workshop on terminology in the cell plasticity field. Definitions for terms such as plasticity, de- and transdifferentiation, reversion, and paligenosis were discussed. Here, we summarize the content and tenor of the symposium and nomenclature-focused workshop with regard to terms in the field. We outline the challenges with current definitions and recommend best practices and approaches to developing an accurate and acceptable nomenclature in the future.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mills, J. C., Stanger, B. Z., & Sander, M. (2019). Nomenclature for cellular plasticity: are the terms as plastic as the cells themselves? The EMBO Journal, 38(19). https://doi.org/10.15252/embj.2019103148

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free