Optimality and complexity of inference-proof data filtering and CQE

7Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The ample literature on confidentiality-preserving data publishing - and controlled query evaluation (CQE) in particular - leaves several questions open. Are the greedy data-filtering algorithms adopted in the literature maximally cooperative? Can novel secure view formats or answer distortion methods improve security or cooperativeness? What is the inherent complexity of confidentiality-preserving data publishing under different constraints, such as cooperativeness and availability? Can the theoretical results on CQE be systematically extended to more general settings? In this paper we answer the above questions using a completely generic, abstract data filtering framework, independent from any syntactic details and data source encodings, and compatible with all possible distortion methods. Some of the main results are: Refusal-based filterings can be adopted as a normal form for all kinds of filterings; greedy refusal-based filterings are optimal; cooperativeness checks and some availability checks are coNP-hard in the simplest case. © 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Biskup, J., Bonatti, P. A., Galdi, C., & Sauro, L. (2014). Optimality and complexity of inference-proof data filtering and CQE. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 8713 LNCS, pp. 165–181). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11212-1_10

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free