Ultrasound vs nerve stimulation multiple injection technique for posterior popliteal sciatic nerve block

75Citations
Citations of this article
80Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In this prospective, randomised, observer-blinded study we evaluated whether ultrasound guidance can shorten the onset time of popliteal sciatic nerve block as compared to nerve stimulation with a multiple injection technique. Forty-four ASA I-III patients undergoing posterior popliteal sciatic nerve block with 20 ml of 0.75% ropivacaine were randomly allocated to nerve stimulation or ultrasound guided nerve block. A blinded observer recorded onset of sensory and motor blocks, success rates, the need for fentanyl intra-operatively, the requirement for general anaesthesia, procedure-related pain, patient satisfaction and side-effects. Onset times for sensory and motor blocks were comparable. The success rate was 100% for ultrasound guided vs 82% for nerve stimulation (p = 0.116). Ultrasound guidance reduced needle redirections (p = 0.01), were associated with less procedural pain (p = 0.002) and required less time to perform (p = 0.002). Ultrasound guidance reduced the time needed for block performance and procedural pain. © 2009 The Authors.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Danelli, G., Fanelli, A., Ghisi, D., Moschini, E., Rossi, M., Ortu, A., … Fanelli, G. (2009). Ultrasound vs nerve stimulation multiple injection technique for posterior popliteal sciatic nerve block. Anaesthesia, 64(6), 638–642. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2009.05915.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free