Anidulafungin and micafungin MIC breakpoints are superior to that of caspofungin for identifying FKS mutant Candida glabrata strains and echinocandin resistance

53Citations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

By CLSI interpretive criteria, anidulafungin and micafungin MICs determined by various methods were sensitive (60 to 70%) and highly specific (94 to 100%) for identifying FKS mutations among 120 Candida glabrata isolates. Anidulafungin and micafungin breakpoints were more specific than CLSI's caspofungin breakpoint in identifying FKS mutant strains and patients with invasive candidiasis who were likely to fail echinocandin treatment (P≤0.0001 for both). Echinocandin MICs were most useful clinically when interpreted in the context of prior echinocandin exposure. Copyright © 2013 White.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shields, R. K., Nguyen, M. H., Press, E. G., Updike, C. L., & Clancy, C. J. (2013). Anidulafungin and micafungin MIC breakpoints are superior to that of caspofungin for identifying FKS mutant Candida glabrata strains and echinocandin resistance. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 57(12), 6361–6365. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01451-13

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free