Feasibility of a 2nd generation MR-compatible manipulator for transrectal prostate biopsy guidance

30Citations
Citations of this article
62Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the feasibility of a 2nd generation MR-compatible, remote-controlled manipulator (RCM) as an aid to perform MR-guided transrectal prostate biopsy in males with suspicion of prostate cancer (PCa). Methods: This prospective phase I study was approved by the local ethical committee and written informed consent was obtained from each patient. Twenty patients with ≥1 cancer suspicious region (CSR) with a PI-RADS score of ≥3 detected on the diagnostic multi-parametric MRI and no prior prostate treatment underwent MR-guided biopsy with the aid of the RCM. Complications were classified according to the modified Clavien system for reporting surgical complications. For evaluation of the workflow, procedure- and manipulation times were recorded. Results: All CSR’s (n=20) were reachable with the MR-compatible RCM and the cancer detection rate was 70 %. The median procedure time was 36:44 minutes (range, 23 – 61 minutes) and the median manipulation time for needle guide movement was 5:48 minutes (range, 1:15 – 18:35 minutes). Two Clavien grade 1 complications were reported. Conclusions: It is feasible and safe to perform transrectal MR-guided prostate biopsy using a MR-compatible RCM as an aid. It is a fast and efficient way to biopsy suspicious prostate lesions with a minimum number of biopsies per patient. Key Points: • It is feasible to perform transrectal prostate biopsy using a MR-compatible RCM. • Using a RCM for MR-guided biopsy is safe, fast, and efficient. • All cancer suspicious regions were reachable with the RCM.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bomers, J. G. R., Bosboom, D. G. H., Tigelaar, G. H., Sabisch, J., Fütterer, J. J., & Yakar, D. (2017). Feasibility of a 2nd generation MR-compatible manipulator for transrectal prostate biopsy guidance. European Radiology, 27(4), 1776–1782. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4504-2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free