Dynamic CTA-derived perfusion maps predict final infarct volume: The simple perfusion reconstruction algorithm

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background and Purpose: Infarct core volume measurement using CTP (CT perfusion) is a mainstay paradigm for stroke treatment decision-making. Yet, there are several downfalls with cine CTP technology that can be overcome by adopting the simple perfusion reconstruction algorithm (SPIRAL) derived from multiphase CTA. We compare SPIRAL with CTP parameters for the prediction of 24-hour infarction. Materials and Methods: Seventy-two patients had admission NCCT, multiphase CTA, CTP, and 24-hour DWI. All patients had successful/quality reperfusion. Patient-level and cohort-level receiver operator characteristic curves were generated to determine accuracy. A 10-fold cross-validation was performed on the cohort-level data. Infarct core volume was compared for SPIRAL, CTP- time-to-maximum, and final DWI by Bland-Altman analysis. Results: When we compared the accuracy in patients with early and late reperfusion for cortical GM and WM, there was no significant difference at the patient level (0.83 versus 0.84, respectively), cohort level (0.82 versus 0.81, respectively), or the cross-validation (0.77 versus 0.74, respectively). In the patient-level receiver operating characteristic analysis, the SPIRAL map had a slightly higher, though nonsignificant (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

McDougall, C. C., Chan, L., Sachan, S., Guo, J., Sah, R. G., Menon, B. K., … Barber, P. A. (2020). Dynamic CTA-derived perfusion maps predict final infarct volume: The simple perfusion reconstruction algorithm. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 41(11), 2034–2040. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6783

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free