The canadian senate: Chamber of sober reflection or Loony Cousin best not talked about

17Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The Canadian Senate has been the object of much debate and scorn. An appointed body, the Senate has never successfully fulfilled its original purposes, namely to be a voice for regional and propertied interests. Its anti-democratic foundations have made the Senate easy prey for public cynicism, despite the fact that its appointed members are more reflective of the Canadian population than the elected members of House of Commons. There have been many attempts at Senate reform in the past quarter-century, none of which have been implemented. This article argues that most attempts at Senate reform have failed because they have been linked to larger constitutional reform packages. The best hope for change to the structure of the Senate lies in smaller, incremental moves that do not require amending the Canadian constitution. © 2002, Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Docherty, D. C. (2002). The canadian senate: Chamber of sober reflection or Loony Cousin best not talked about. Journal of Legislative Studies, 8(3), 27–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/714003922

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free