Advancing indigenous research sovereignty: Public administration trends and the opportunity for meaningful conversations in canadian research governance

11Citations
Citations of this article
74Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Federally funded research in Canada is of significant scope and scale. The implications of research in the colonial project has resulted in a fraught relationship between Indigenous Peoples and Western research. Research governance, as an aspect of public administration, is evolving. The relationality inherent in new public governance (NPG)-a nascent public governance regime-may align with Indigenous relationality concepts. Recent societal advances, such as the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), the Truth and Reconcilliation Commission of Canada (TRC), and the Indigenous Institutes Act in Ontario, provide further impetus for Indigenous self-determination in multiple domains including research. This article advocates for Indigenous research sovereignty and concludes with suggestions for ways in which federal funding agencies, specifically the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC), could contribute to the advancement of Indigenous research sovereignty.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Williams, K. J., Umangay, U., & Brant, S. (2020). Advancing indigenous research sovereignty: Public administration trends and the opportunity for meaningful conversations in canadian research governance. International Indigenous Policy Journal, 11(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.18584/iipj.2020.11.1.10237

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free