Impact of the number of iterations in compressed sensing reconstruction on ultrafast dynamic contrast-enhanced breast mr imaging

13Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the impact of the number of iterations of compressed sensing (CS) reconstruction on the kinetic parameters and image quality in dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI of the breast, with prospectively undersampled CS-accelerated scans.Materials and Methods: Breast examinations including ultrafast DCE-MRI using CS were conducted for 21 patients. Images were reconstructed with different numbers of iterations. The peak enhancement ratio of the aorta and wash-in slope, initial area under the curve, and Ktrans of the breast lesions were measured. The root mean square error and structural similarity between the images using 50 iterations and images with a lower number of iterations were evaluated as criterion for quantitative image evaluation.Results: Using an insufficient number of iterations, the contrast-enhanced effect was highly underestimated. In all semi-quantitative parameters, the number of iterations that stabilized the parameters in malignant lesions was higher than that in benign lesions. At least 15 iterations were needed for semi-quantitative parameters. For Ktrans, there were no significant differences between 10 and 50 iterations in both malignant and benign lesions.Conclusion: The kinetic parameters using ultrafast DCE-MRI with CS are affected by the number of iterations, especially in malignant lesions. However, if the images are reconstructed with an adequate number of iterations, ultrafast DCE-MRI with CS can be a powerful technique having high temporal and spatial resolution.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sagawa, H., Kataoka, M., Kanao, S., Onishi, N., Nickel, M. D., Toi, M., & Togashi, K. (2019). Impact of the number of iterations in compressed sensing reconstruction on ultrafast dynamic contrast-enhanced breast mr imaging. Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences, 18(3), 200–207. https://doi.org/10.2463/mrms.mp.2018-0015

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free