Conceptual design science research? How and why untested meta-artifacts have a place in IS

3Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This study presents both a rationale and a method for conducting conceptual design science research (DSR) that creates abstract and untested meta-artifacts. The DSR paradigm is centered upon a design-evaluate dynamic, in which designs are not only created but also put to the test in working environments. Yet there are occasions where the initial design theorizing is so challenging and complex as to warrant a contribution in its own right. Thus, a method is proposed for the design of meta-artifacts, based upon the systematic analysis and synthesis of existing artifacts. This method is demonstrated in the design of a meta-artifact for a novel crowdfunding platform that accommodates the pre-purchase of information and communication technology hardware products and services from businesses of all sizes, including medium-to-large enterprises. © 2014 Springer International Publishing.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gleasure, R. (2014). Conceptual design science research? How and why untested meta-artifacts have a place in IS. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 8463 LNCS, pp. 99–114). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06701-8_7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free