Conversational contextualism states that the truth-conditions expressed by knowledge-attributing sentences vary relative to the context of utterance. This context is determined partly by different standards the person involved must meet in order to make the sentence true. I am concerned with the question of how these standards can be raised or lowered, and especially what happens to the standards and the conversational score when parties in a discussion push the conversational scores in different directions. None of the available options for an answer seems satisfying. I argue that this results from a misunderstanding of the characteristics of the situation at hand. © 2005 Springer.
CITATION STYLE
Gottschling, V. (2005). Keeping the conversational score: Constraints for an optimal contextualist answer? In Contextualisms in Epistemology (pp. 153–172). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3835-6_9
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.