Gamification and Game-Based Learning as Cooperative Learning Tools: A Systematic Review

  • Fonseca I
  • Caviedes M
  • Chantré J
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
138Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Innovation has changed teaching-learning processes; among the strategies that have been implemented are gamification and game-based learning, which are related to the use of games to generate spaces for participation. On the other hand, cooperative learning promotes scenarios of discussion, group work, and socialization. A systematic review is presented, following the PRISMA methodology. SCOPUS, WoS, and ERIC databases were used, and 20 articles published in the period from 2012 to 2021 were chosen. The results show that the cooperative model, gamification, and game-based learning allow the strengthening of academic, personal, and social skills in playful spaces that foster emotions and creativity. In-person, virtual, and blended activities, role-playing, and assignment to improve motivation are some of the options for the implementation of the model. Some applied tools are Scratch, Kahoot, Pandemic, Night of the Living Debt, Spoc, Minecraft, Scape Room, Cerebriti Edu, GaCoCo, Crazy Racket, and Keep Dancing. We conclude that the development of new learning environments allows students and teachers to work in groups and achieve the proposed objectives, with more participation, interaction, motivation, and inclusion.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fonseca, I., Caviedes, M., Chantré, J., & Bernate, J. (2023). Gamification and Game-Based Learning as Cooperative Learning Tools: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 18(21), 4–23. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v18i21.40035

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 17

57%

Lecturer / Post doc 7

23%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

10%

Researcher 3

10%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 11

46%

Social Sciences 6

25%

Psychology 4

17%

Arts and Humanities 3

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free