Management of Prosthetic Infection According to Organism

  • Peel T
  • Buising K
  • Dowsey M
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Since the advent of prosthetic joint replacement surgery, patients with arthritis have had significant improvement in pain-relief, mobility and quality of life. Approximately 90,000 Australians undergo joint replacement surgery each year [1]. With an ageing population, this number will increase (figure 1). Similar data from USA predicts that by 2030 the number of procedures per year will increase to 4.05 million [2]. Despite the overall success of this surgery, infection of the prosthesis remains a devastating complication [3]. Of concern, the incidence of prosthetic joint infection is increasing, in proportion to the number of procedures being performed [4]. Significant patient morbidity is associated with prosthetic joint infections, including the need for further operative procedures, long-term antibiotic therapy with associated toxicity, and prolonged hospitalisation [3]. In addition, the cost to the health system is substantial. The cost of treating infection is 3-5 times the cost of primary arthroplasty [5, 6]. In Australia, the annual additional expenditure incurred as a result of this devastating complication is estimated at AUD $90 million per year [6]. In the United States, the annual cost of treatment of prosthetic joint infection is projected to exceed US$1.6 billion dollars by 2020[7].

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Peel, T., Buising, K., Dowsey, M., & Choong, P. (2013). Management of Prosthetic Infection According to Organism. In Arthroplasty - Update. InTech. https://doi.org/10.5772/53244

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free