Viability of a serum infliximab concentration-detecting reagent as a qualitative assay for an infliximab biosimilar

1Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The efficacy of infliximab in treating rheumatoid arthritis depends on its serum trough concentration, which must be maintained at a minimum of 1µg/mL to achieve the desired effects. However, Japan’s National Health Insurance system does not cover tests for rheumatoid arthritis patients undergoing treatment with biosimilar infliximab because its performance as a biosimilar remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate whether the Remi-check Q qualitative assay yields comparable results for biosimilar infliximab and the originator product. Infliximab BS 100 “NK” and Remicade 100® were separately diluted in pooled human serum to yield test samples at the following concentrations: 0.30, 0.70, 1.20, and 3.00µg/mL. Prepared samples were quantitatively assessed using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and qualitatively using Remi-check Q, and the results obtained for the originator and biosimilar product were compared. For both originator and biosimilar infliximab, Remi-check Q yielded a negative result for all 0.30 and 0.70µg/mL samples and a positive result for all 3.00µg/mL samples. However, negative results were obtained with a fraction of the 1.20µg/mL samples (biosimilar, 4/15; originator, 3/15). Concurrence rates between the results of quantitative ELISA and qualitative Remi-check Q analyses were comparable between originator and biosimilar infliximab at all tested concentrations. These results indicate that Remi-check Q yields comparable results for biosimilar infliximab and the originator product on being used as a qualitative assay for trough serum levels.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Inagaki, T., Isesaki, T., Kawana, K., & Funakoshi, R. (2021). Viability of a serum infliximab concentration-detecting reagent as a qualitative assay for an infliximab biosimilar. Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, 44(9), 1272–1279. https://doi.org/10.1248/bpb.b21-00145

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free