Populismo constitucional y reelecciones: Viscitudes institucionales en la experiencia sudamericana

7Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The recent Latin American comparative experience seems to have a common denominator, strong executive powers that have ruled for many presidential periods, at the expense of each constitutional model. Different variables sociological, political and economic might explain this situation, however, this article argues that the constitutional courts are the latest institutional spaces that have strengthened or have rethought the contemporary state model, favoring the extension of presidential power. To develop this research, I have taken the cases of Venezuela, Colombia and Ecuador, particular experiences where presidents of the last decades have refounded the existing constitutional order and have extended their own presidential periods.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Reactive vs structural approach: A public law response to populism

16Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Structural problems of the 2008 Ecuadorian constitution and the authoritarian hyper-presidentialism

12Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Removal of the Constitutional Chamber Justices in El Salvador: A Story About the Fragility of Judicial Independence

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sarmiento Erazo, J. P. (2013). Populismo constitucional y reelecciones: Viscitudes institucionales en la experiencia sudamericana. Estudios Constitucionales, 11(1), 569–601. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-52002013000100016

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

100%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 5

100%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free