Why do genotypes of Picea glauca differ in their growth response to elevated CO 2?

4Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Meta-analyses reveal that fast-growing species have a greater growth response to elevated CO 2 than slow-growing species. It is unknown whether this is a direct response or whether inter-specific differences in growth are simply correlated with other physiological or morphological differences among species that affect the growth response to CO 2. Here we use intra-specific variation in Picea glauca to examine the mechanistic basis for this relationship. Relative growth rate (RGR) of 29 genotypes grown at ambient (370 μll -1) or elevated (740 μll -1) CO 2 was measured. Physiological and morphological traits describing differences in allocation, canopy structure, stomatal function and photosynthesis were determined. Most variation in RGR (74%) was explained by traits associated with canopy structure. Although there was a strong correlation between RGR740 and RGR370, we found no evidence that genotypes that grew fast at ambient CO 2 had a greater relative growth response to CO 2. Given that the pattern found at the intra-specific level differed from that reported at the inter-specific level, our results suggest that RGR per se does not affect the growth response to CO 2. Rather, the CO 2 growth response is determined by traits that may or may not be correlated with RGR. © The Author 2011. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhang, J., Mycroft, E. E., Adams, G., & Reekie, E. (2011). Why do genotypes of Picea glauca differ in their growth response to elevated CO 2? Tree Physiology, 31(1), 16–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpq097

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free