Influence of anaesthetic and analgesic techniques on outcome after surgery

173Citations
Citations of this article
171Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Postoperative symptoms and complications can be prevented by a suitable choice of anaesthetic and analgesic technique for specific procedures. The aim of analgesic protocols is not only to reduce pain intensity but also to decrease the incidence of side-effects from analgesic agents and to improve patient comfort. Moreover, adequate pain control is a prerequisite for the use of rehabilitation programmes to accelerate recovery from surgery. Thus, combining opioid and/or non-opioid analgesics with regional analgesic techniques not only improves analgesic efficacy but also reduces opioid demand and side-effects such as nausea and vomiting, sedation, and prolongation of postoperative ileus. Although all attempts to demonstrate that regional anaesthesia and analgesia decrease postoperative mortality are unsuccessful, there is evidence supporting a reduction in pulmonary complications after major abdominal surgery, and an improvement in patient rehabilitation after orthopaedic surgery. When such techniques are used, cost-benefit analysis should be considered to determine suitable analgesic protocols for specific surgical procedures. © The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia 2004. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bonnet, F., & Marret, E. (2005). Influence of anaesthetic and analgesic techniques on outcome after surgery. British Journal of Anaesthesia. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aei038

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free