Influence of smoking cessation after diagnosis of early stage lung cancer on prognosis: Systematic review of observational studies with meta-analysis

615Citations
Citations of this article
407Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To systematically review the evidence that smoking cessation after diagnosis of a primary lung tumour affects prognosis. Design: Systematic review with meta-analysis. Data sources: CINAHL (from 1981), Embase (from 1980), Medline (from 1966), Web of Science (from 1966), CENTRAL (from 1977) to December 2008, and reference lists of included studies. Study selection: Randomised controlled trials or observational longitudinal studies that measured the effect of quitting smoking after diagnosis of lung cancer on prognostic outcomes, regardless of stage at presentation or tumour histology, were included. Data extraction: Two researchers independently identified studies for inclusion and extracted data. Estimates were combined by using a random effects model, and the I2 statistic was used to examine heterogeneity. Life tables were used to model five year survival for early stage nonsmall cell lung cancer and limited stage small cell lung cancer, using death rates for continuing smokers and quitters obtained from this review. Results: In 9/10 included studies, most patients studied were diagnosed as having an early stage lung tumour. Continued smoking was associated with a significantly increased risk of all cause mortality (hazard ratio 2.94, 95% confidence interval 1.15 to 7.54) and recurrence (1.86, 1.01 to 3.41) in early stage non-small cell lung cancer and of all cause mortality (1.86, 1.33 to 2.59), development of a second primary tumour (4.31, 1.09 to 16.98), and recurrence (1.26, 1.06 to 1.50) in limited stage small cell lung cancer. No study contained data on the effect of quitting smoking on cancer specific mortality or on development of a second primary tumour in nonsmall cell lung cancer. Life table modelling on the basis of these data estimated 33% five year survival in 65 year old patients with early stage non-small cell lung cancer who continued to smoke compared with 70% in those who quit smoking. In limited stage small cell lung cancer, an estimated 29% of continuing smokers would survive for five years compared with 63% of quitters on the basis of the data from this review. Conclusions: This review provides preliminary evidence that smoking cessation after diagnosis of early stage lung cancer improves prognostic outcomes. From life table modelling, the estimated number of deaths prevented is larger than would be expected from reduction of cardiorespiratory deaths after smoking cessation, so most of the mortality gain is likely to be due to reduced cancer progression. These findings indicate that offering smoking cessation treatment to patients presenting with early stage lung cancer may be beneficial.

References Powered by Scopus

Extracting summary statistics to perform meta-analyses of the published literature for survival endpoints

4072Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Mortality in relation to smoking: 50 Years' observations on male British doctors

2700Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Tobacco smoke carcinogens and lung cancer

1703Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2012

2546Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Guidelines for enhanced recovery after lung surgery: Recommendations of the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS<sup>®</sup>) Society and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS)

895Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Small-cell lung cancer

871Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Parsons, A., Daley, A., Begh, R., & Aveyard, P. (2010, January 30). Influence of smoking cessation after diagnosis of early stage lung cancer on prognosis: Systematic review of observational studies with meta-analysis. BMJ (Online). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b5569

Readers over time

‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25015304560

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 155

70%

Researcher 36

16%

Professor / Associate Prof. 20

9%

Lecturer / Post doc 11

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 160

75%

Psychology 21

10%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20

9%

Nursing and Health Professions 12

6%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1
References: 1
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 31

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0