Cumulative assessment: Strategic choices to influence students' study effort

21Citations
Citations of this article
52Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: It has been asserted that assessment can and should be used to drive students' learning. In the current study, we present a cumulative assessment program in which test planning, repeated testing and compensation are combined in order to influence study effort. The program is aimed at helping initially low-scoring students improve their performance during a module, without impairing initially high-scoring students' performance. We used performance as a proxy for study effort and investigated whether the program worked as intended. Methods. We analysed students' test scores in two second-year (n = 494 and n = 436) and two third-year modules (n = 383 and n = 345) in which cumulative assessment was applied. We used t-tests to compare the change in test scores of initially low-scoring students with that of initially high-scoring students between the first and second subtest and again between the combined first and second subtest and the third subtest. During the interpretation of the outcomes we took regression to the mean and test difficulty into account. Results: Between the first and the second subtest in all four modules, the scores of initially low-scoring students increased more than the scores of initially high-scoring students decreased. Between subtests two and three, we found a similar effect in one module, no significant effect in two modules and the opposite effect in another module. Conclusion: The results between the first two subtests suggest that cumulative assessment may positively influence students' study effort. The inconsistent outcomes between subtests two and three may be caused by differences in perceived imminence, impact and workload between the third subtest and the first two. Cumulative assessment may serve as an example of how several evidence-based assessment principles can be integrated into a program for the benefit of student learning. © 2013 Kerdijk et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

References Powered by Scopus

The Power of Testing Memory: Basic Research and Implications for Educational Practice

1470Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Regression to the mean: What it is and how to deal with it

1424Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The critical importance of retrieval for learning

1308Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Automated Assessment in Computer Science Education: A State-of-the-Art Review

152Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Conceptualising spaced learning in health professions education: A scoping review

60Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Mental health among university students: The associations of effort-reward imbalance and overcommitment with psychological distress

42Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kerdijk, W., Tio, R. A., Mulder, B. F., & Cohen-Schotanus, J. (2013). Cumulative assessment: Strategic choices to influence students’ study effort. BMC Medical Education, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-13-172

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Lecturer / Post doc 17

44%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 16

41%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

10%

Researcher 2

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 16

44%

Social Sciences 9

25%

Medicine and Dentistry 8

22%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free