Novo&Stitch: Accurate reconciliation of genome assemblies via optical maps

15Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Motivation: De novo genome assembly is a challenging computational problem due to the high repetitive content of eukaryotic genomes and the imperfections of sequencing technologies (i.e. sequencing errors, uneven sequencing coverage and chimeric reads). Several assembly tools are currently available, each of which has strengths and weaknesses in dealing with the trade-off between maximizing contiguity and minimizing assembly errors (e.g. mis-joins). To obtain the best possible assembly, it is common practice to generate multiple assemblies from several assemblers and/or parameter settings and try to identify the highest quality assembly. Unfortunately, often there is no assembly that both maximizes contiguity and minimizes assembly errors, so one has to compromise one for the other. Results: The concept of assembly reconciliation has been proposed as a way to obtain a higher quality assembly by merging or reconciling all the available assemblies. While several reconciliation methods have been introduced in the literature, we have shown in one of our recent papers that none of them can consistently produce assemblies that are better than the assemblies provided in input. Here we introduce Novo&Stitch, a novel method that takes advantage of optical maps to accurately carry out assembly reconciliation (assuming that the assembled contigs are sufficiently long to be reliably aligned to the optical maps, e.g. 50 Kbp or longer). Experimental results demonstrate that Novo&Stitch can double the contiguity (N50) of the input assemblies without introducing mis-joins or reducing genome completeness.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pan, W., Wanamaker, S. I., Ah-Fong, A. M. V., Judelson, H. S., & Lonardi, S. (2018). Novo&Stitch: Accurate reconciliation of genome assemblies via optical maps. In Bioinformatics (Vol. 34, pp. i43–i51). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bty255

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free