Longitudinal predictors of subjective recovery in psychosis

46Citations
Citations of this article
100Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Research has highlighted the importance of recovery as defined by the service user, and suggests a link to negative emotion, although little is known about the role of negative emotion in predicting subjective recovery. Aims To investigate longitudinal predictors of variability in recovery scores with a focus on the role of negative emotion. Method Participants (n=110) with experience of psychosis completed measures of psychiatric symptoms, social functioning, subjective recovery, depression, hopelessness and selfesteem at baseline and 6 months later. Path analysis was used to examine predictive factors for recovery and negative emotion. Results Subjective recovery scores were predicted by negative emotion, positive self-esteem and hopelessness, and to a lesser extent by symptoms and functioning. Current recovery score was not predicted by past recovery score after accounting for past symptoms, current hopelessness and current positive self-esteem. Conclusions Psychosocial factors and negative emotion appear to be the strongest longitudinal predictors of variation in subjective recovery, rather than psychiatric symptoms.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Law, H., Shryane, N., Bentall, R. P., & Morrison, A. P. (2016). Longitudinal predictors of subjective recovery in psychosis. British Journal of Psychiatry, 209(1), 48–53. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.114.158428

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free