False-positive results and contamination in nucleic acid amplification assays: Suggestions for a prevent and destroy strategy

252Citations
Citations of this article
301Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Contamination of samples with DNA is still a major problem in microbiology laboratories, despite the wide acceptance of PCR and other amplification techniques for the detection of frequently low amounts of target DNA. This review focuses on the implications of contamination in the diagnosis and research of infectious diseases, possible sources of contaminants, strategies for prevention and destruction, and quality control. Contamination of samples in diagnostic PCR can have farreaching consequences for patients, as illustrated by several examples in this review. Furthermore, it appears that the (sometimes very unexpected) sources of contaminants are diverse (including water, reagents, disposables, sample carry over, and amplicon), and contaminants can also be introduced by unrelated activities in neighboring laboratories. Therefore, lack of communication between researchers using the same laboratory space can be considered a risk factor. Only a very limited number of multicenter quality control studies have been published so far, but these showed false-positive rates of 9-57%. The overall conclusion is that although nucleic acid amplification assays are basically useful both in research and in the clinic, their accuracy depends on awareness of risk factors and the proper use of procedures for the prevention of nucleic acid contamination. The discussion of prevention and destruction strategies included in this review may serve as a guide to help improve laboratory practices and reduce the number of false-positive amplification results. © Springer-Verlag 2004.

References Powered by Scopus

Enzymatic amplification of β-globin genomic sequences and restriction site analysis for diagnosis of sickle cell anemia

7464Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Avoiding false positives with PCR

3163Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Nucleic acid sequence-based amplification

1159Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Prevalence and Diversity of Microbes in the Amniotic Fluid, the Fetal Inflammatory Response, and Pregnancy Outcome in Women with Preterm Pre-Labor Rupture of Membranes

401Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Ultrasensitive and Highly Specific Lateral Flow Assays for Point-of-Care Diagnosis

349Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

GenoType MTBDR assays for the diagnosis of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: A meta-analysis

330Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Borst, A., Box, A. T. A., & Fluit, A. C. (2004, April). False-positive results and contamination in nucleic acid amplification assays: Suggestions for a prevent and destroy strategy. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-004-1100-1

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 110

62%

Researcher 51

29%

Professor / Associate Prof. 13

7%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 82

53%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 40

26%

Medicine and Dentistry 21

14%

Engineering 11

7%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
References: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free