Is folic acid safe for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients? An evidence-based cohort study

21Citations
Citations of this article
59Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Patients with cancer are highly concerned about food choices and dietary supplements that may affect their treatment outcomes. Excess folic acid (synthetic folate) from supplements or fortification can lead to accumulation of unmetabolized folic acid in the systemic circulation and urine and may promote cancer growth, especially among those with neoplastic alterations. Objective: We investigated the prospective association between synthetic compared with natural folate intake and clinical outcomes in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), which is a highly recurrent disease. Design: In a cohort of 619 NMIBC patients, folate intake at diagnosis was assessed with a previously validated food-frequency questionnaire and categorized according to tertiles. After a median follow-up of 5.2 y, 303 tumor recurrence and 108 progression events were documented from medical record review. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards and logistic models were used to estimate adjusted HRs and ORs with 95% CIs. Results: Synthetic folic acid intake was positively associated with a risk of recurrence among NMIBC patients (medium compared with low intake-HR: 1.72; 95% CI: 1.20, 2.48; P = 0.003; high compared with low intake-HR: 1.80; 95% CI: 1.14, 2.84; P = 0.01). Patients with a higher folic acid intake were more likely to have multifocal tumors at diagnosis (medium or high compared with low-OR: 2.08; 95% CI: 1.08, 4.02; P = 0.03). In contrast, natural folate intake tended to be inversely associated with the risk of progression (medium or high compared with low-HR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.44, 1.04; P = 0.08). Conclusions: A high intake of synthetic folic acid, in contrast to the natural forms, is associated with an increased risk of recurrence in NMIBC and multifocal tumors at diagnosis, which suggests that folic acid may be unsafe for NMIBC patients. These findings provide some evidence for nutritional consultation with regard to folate intake among NMIBC patients.

References Powered by Scopus

Tissue-based map of the human proteome

10385Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Total energy intake: Implications for epidemiologic analyses

2839Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Predicting recurrence and progression in individual patients with stage Ta T1 bladder cancer using EORTC risk tables: A combined analysis of 2596 patients from seven EORTC trials

2386Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

B vitamins and their role in immune regulation and cancer

202Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Potential reversal of epigenetic age using a diet and lifestyle intervention: a pilot randomized clinical trial

192Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Periconceptional intake of folic acid among low-risk women in Canada: Summary of a workshop aiming to align prenatal folic acid supplement composition with current expert guidelines

48Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tu, H., Dinney, C. P., Ye, Y., Grossman, H. B., Lerner, S. P., & Wu, X. (2018). Is folic acid safe for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients? An evidence-based cohort study. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 107(2), 208–216. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqx019

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 20

74%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

11%

Researcher 3

11%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 13

43%

Medicine and Dentistry 11

37%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 4

13%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 2

7%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free